Rock,
Pop & The Drop:
Pop Imagery & Nuclear Issues in Rock
Video Clips
published in Waves No.78, Melbourne,
1986
I
thought that acompilation titled so “Songs From The
Protest Era” (complete with a DC-styled comic cover
of hippies carrying banners) was pretty silly. It was released
around '83/'84 and what with shows like “Family Ties”
and films like “The Big Chill”, that 'era' had
obviously ripened into nostalgia. Then out comes it's eighties
equivalent: “Rock Against The Drop”. Incredible.
No nostalgia here - this is Urgent Messages For Sale. Who
would ever have thought that 'causes' would reach such a
stage whereby commercial enterprises (i.e. record companies)
could silently assume the identity of a political action
group?
The
television ad for this record did everything but say, "the
proceeds of this record go to" etc., which leaves me
to wonder: how are we to distinguish between an ad for this
record (put out by a company that will release anything
in lumps of twenty) and an ad for a certified political
cause? Our
money for the record - economically speaking - can be rendered
indistinguishable from our contribution to a 'cause' due
to (i) both relying on us substantiating our emotional-cum-political
response with the old quick dip into the pocket; and (ii)
the equatable ineffectiveness of what strategic power the
collected money has. This observation is neither pessimistic
nor nihilistic, but rather a statement of similarities.
One
can extend this problematic lack of difference whenein politics
are virtually evaporated. Take two rock performers who have
extended their performance field, their arena of communication:
Peter Garrett (Midnight Oil) and Paul Jones (Manfred Mann).
One took on politics ('85) and one took on acting ('67)
– and that is precisely where the differences dissolve
and the similarities spread, for as undeniably committed
as Peter Garrett is, his reception and consumption by his
audience run the risk of marking him as tragic a figure
as Paul Jones' rock star character in Peter Watkin's over-politicized
“Privilege” ('67). I make this comparison by
way of proposing that the overlapping between Rock and Politics
has generally always been in their theatrics: the lead figure,
the stage, the spectacle, the audience. The force and power
is to be found in that framework of production - and not
in their desire, intention or influence.
As
the audience, our overlapping space in this conflation of
Rock and Politics is in the realm of gesture, identification
and catharsis. I mean, a raised clenched fist is a raised
clenched fist whether we do it for Radio Birdman, Iron Maiden,
Midnight Oil or Queen. In the ever-politicized climate of
today (when Youth is being recognized as some sort of universal
lobby group and even the most schmaltzy songs carry not
messages but social ultimatums) the going thing is a political
reaction. That is why a record like “Rock Against
The Drop” is commercially viable: the times aren't
a-changing but demographic surveys certainly are. To an
extent this also explains why the latest Army ads on television
have dropped their pastiches of Apocalypse Now (that's old-style
now) in favour of music directly cloned from U2. No song
in particular, just their sound --that great quasipolitical
/anti-military/neo-youth feeling we know so well. Gesture,
identification, catharsis. The Army, is/isn't the Army is/isn't
U2. After a while the differences become blurred - something
that the advertising agencies know only too well.
And
so to the world of video clips. A thousand-and-one art directors
proudly stand back to admire their version of a nuclear
wasteland/ a post-apocalyptic scenario / a New Wave arniageddon
/ a Hard Rock holocaust. How exhilirating it must feel to
combine Art and Politics.
The
VC for The Police's “Synchronicity II” has a
certain obliqueness in it's favour. Each member is on top
of a monstrously large pile of disused and derelict equipment
and instruments related to their role in the group. Wearing
chic tattered leather, grimy faces and gale-blown hair,
the image is strangely poetic, evoking the notion of an
overconsumption of music being responsible for Rock's Royalty,
sitting atop their garbage thrones oblivious to a world
in decay. The Models' VC for “God Bless America”
is only good if you haven't seen “Synchronicily II”.
They fossick around a garage dump like nightclub urchins,
framed atop mountains of metal and inside squashed sedans.
They even finish up the clip by, sending up Joe Rosenthal's
famous photo of the taking of Iwo Jima - a parody that itself
is strictly sixties. The song's message feigns a suitably
sarcastic tone, but its naivity in playing with all that
is supposedly connatated by 'America' makes its cynicism
cave in on itself.
Perhaps
the most oblique and deliberately obscure (read: deeply
poetic) VC is David Bowie's controversial “Let's Dance”.
But let's face it - throw in footage of an atomic explosion
and any turkey will think you've got a serious statement
to make. Mix it with images of aborigines and you're laughing.
Bowie must be laughing (smugly or nervously?) at the reactions
to his somewhat tiresome Burroughs- style manipulation of
overtly political imagery (aborigines, society, class, industry,
leisure, etc.). The nouveau neo-real Bowie is just as much
of a stylised facade as Ziggy Stardust and it's highly likely,
that if we didn't have the “Let’s Dance”
VC as it is we would probably regard the album as being
just another quirky introspective Pop poem by a self-consciously
stylised 'chameleon of Rock'.
However,
Bowie, The Police and even The Models come off a bit better
when compared to some of the grossly naive fusions of nuclear
statements with Pop imagery. The Ultravox VC for “Dancing
With Tears In My Eyes” is what I guess you'd call
political romanticism at its worst. Once again, Ultravox
take blunt and blatant cues from the cinema, in particular
the 1961 anti-atomic British film “The Day The Earth
Caught Fire” as well as a nod in the direction of
“The Day After” ('83). Whilst the former film
has considerable and lasting impact, the latter is a good
example of trash hypo-docu-dramas which shake the world
for three months only to then evaporate from people's memories.
In “Dancing With Tears In My Eyes” poor Midge
goes home to be with his wife when they drop the big one.
The whole scenario is about as romantic as an ad for Lady
Scott toilet paper. And if you thought Ultravox were deluded,
check out John Paul Young's VC for “Wargames”:
nuclear wastelands, mutants playing video games and J.P.Y.
emoting in a tattered jet pilot suit. “Wargames”
loses out both ways - it's either totally insincere or totally
dumb.
Some VCs appear to be comparatively more sincere and committed
in their intentions - although it does not follow that they
are any more effective or successful in putting their message
across. Midnight Oil are a good example of this. Musically,
their songs carry an incredible power and intensity, but
their visuals have never matched their sound - a mismatch
that can be fatal. “The Power & The Passion”
lyrically might be a series of blunt cliches devoid of any
irony, but it sure is a powerhouse of a Rock song. In the
clip, an attempt has been made to capture the Oil's live
energy, and although it hardly perfects this, it comes off
better than their performance in screen-printed overalls
in “Read A bout It”. The animated segments (which
reportedly cost a small fortune required by the animator
of The Wall) present the nuclear issue most directly with
people pushing a panel-van who are then turned to stone
by The Blast, but such a scene is too isolated to carry
meaning for the clip as a whole. “Armistice Day”
is another Midnight Oil VC which fails through its inability
to fuse image with music. The sixties are once again heralded,
this time in the almost classical form of superimposing
war footage on shots of the band playing live. An interesting
textual desire arises from this, as it is almost as if the
band want to fully experience the reality of which they
speak, to cover themselves (metaphorically and materially)
with the horror, the pain, the misery. Essentially, the
“Armistice Day” VC testifies to the pros and
cons of Midnight Oil's blind passion.
Africa
Bambaata and John Lydon's “Time Zone: World Destruction”
is so intense it ends up being a theatrical facade. Everyone
knows Lydon's snarling stare too well for it to project
its original potency, and images of him smearing blood on
a television screen is a shallow and impotent attack on
the media. Bam is equally absurd with his satirical neo-political
posturing in the guise of some sort of black Liberace. Such
politico-posing (also to be found in the likes of Killing
Joke and Spy Vs Spy) is severely outmoded by twenty years
worth of films that attack/send-up/ enact the politician
and his platform. (Fortunately, Lydon has returned with
a punch with the VC to “Rise”: this time, when
he says “Anger is an energy" you can believe
him.) Still, Bambaata and Lydon's statement is refreshingly
extreme when compared to the prissy finger-wagging of The
Hooters' VC to “All You Zombies”, and the immature
warnings brought out by The Expression's mixture of Spandau
Ballet and Redgum (!) to produce “I Always Close My
Eyes”. The same can be said of The Divinyls’
VC to “The Good Die Young”: a great song, but
its urban/sci-fi/fantasy setting is a bit too convoluted
to make a coherent statement other than sensationalizing
the horror of radio-active burns.
Of
course Mad Max serves as a major influence oil nearly all
post-apocalypse scenarios produced in the eighties. Rose
Tattoo's “We Can't Be Beaten” continues their
desire to write penultimate rebel anthems, and this one
shows just how desperate they are. Recalling the Carltonesque
counter-cultwe commune of Mad Max II, The Tatts are surrounded
by a demographic horde as obviously organized as the 'ordinary
people' in the Jackson's “The Triumph”. The
latter, though, is skilfully manipulative whereas “We
Can't Be Beaten” is irritatingly weak. The Angel's
VC for “Underground” plays upon the similarities
Doc Neeson's face shares with Mel Gibson's by writing him
into a scenario of the loner borrowed straight out of the
first Mad Max movie. Doc leaves the outside world after
The Drop and mourns his lost wife. Dwelling in the underground
(in the umpteenth visual debt to Cocteau's “Orphee”,
1950) he attempts to cut a grim stoic figure like Max Rockatowsky.
Actually, The Angels' “Underground” doesn't
say much either way about nuclear issues and amounts to
not much more than an uncaring pastiche of a popular film.
The image of politics as opposed to political imagery.
Well
I've ripped into twelve Vcs - but there are another seven
which 1 would strongly defend. Whereas midnight Oil's “Armistice
Day” and Bambaata/Lydon's “Time Zone”
use war footage to thrust their message Vietnam-style 'into
our loungerooms' other VCs have used wartime propoganda
footage to work against itself (a tack cleverly utilized
in “The Atomic Café”, ‘82). Instrumental
New York band The Raybeats had a VC to a song (the title
escapes me) which featured nothing but collaged found-footage
of various media myths and cliches from the Atomic Fifties
and the Cold War Sixties. Even though their manipulation
of this footage presented no direct statement, it did carry
a built-in satirical effect. Donald Fagen's VC for “A
New Frontier” recreates this type of footage in an
appropriately retro/new wave style recalling the neo-Cubist
animation of the Disney and Warner Brothers studios during
the early fifties. In “A New Frontier”, a strictly-nerd
couple retire to their quaint suburban fall-out shelter
(every home should have one!) for a little romantic dalliance.
The clip might be set in the fifties or the ultra-hip eighties,
but the point is made that ignorance of the after-effects
of nuclear destruction is widespread and hasn't changed
much over the past thirty years.
Giving
credit where credit is due, the originators of this type
of satirical manipulation of old film material has to be
Devo. (See their 1978 film “The Men Who Make The Music”.)
It is no surprise then that their VC to “It's A Beautiful
World” shows maturity and clarity in what amount to
an acute and perceptive handling of what Devo have loosely
termed ‘mutant devo imagery': supposedly conventional
images of what normal people view to be normal representations
of themselves. To highlight this whole process of image
manufacture, Devo's Boogie Boy stands behind a strange apparatus
that projects ‘images of the world' onto his screen.
The resultant collage is a heady trip through social normality
underscored by cynicism. The end image of an atomic explosion
stands as a complex coda to the problem of a society that
is by nature self-destructive. In such a presentation (thematically
continued on from all their videos) Devo show that restraint
and accuracy allow them to control their images where others
have fallen prey to their own excesses.
Considerably
influenced by Devo's pioneering style, the Mental As Anything
VCs have sustained their own individual slant on this type
of image manipulation by infusing it with a wacky carefree
sense of humour. “Apocalypso” (which incidentally
was the title of a Monochrome Set single back in 1980) is
perhaps their most pointed video, but their cornball animation
and pixilation (resembling a cinematic extension of John
Stalin's seminal postcards) prevent the clip from preaching
its morality tale. Both Devo and Mental As Anything share
a similar working method by speaking with their imagery
as opposed to talking through it.
In comparison, though, I would have to say that Devo have
a greater degree of sophistication and potency in their
clips, whilst the Mental As Anything VCs often seem more
concerned with the gag than the guts of what they're addressing.
This perhaps explains why Devo have always appropriated
the language(s) of advertising (particularly by large American
corporations) whilst advertising has approplated Mental
As Anything (see the Big M giant kangaroo ad and the ‘New
Wave’ introduction to “Simon Townsend's Wonderworld”).
Advertising, of course,has picked up everyone and everything
from Madness to Speilberg to Sade to Monty Python - but
the only thing advertising could appropriate from Devo is
its own reflection. Perhaps the political edge for today
is not whether or not you can be co-opted, but whether or
not you can be appropiated.
This
is not to imply that the Mentals are all fun and Devo are
merely analytical, because Devo have produced the funniest
VC I've ever seen - which also happens to be one of their
most vicious anti-nuclear statements. Their clip to (the
name escapes me) sets the band up as waste-disposal men
working in a nuclear fusion plant out in the Arizona desert.
They all wear blue overalls and their skin is a glowirig
bright orange! But they carry on with their work, manhandling
nuclear-waste tins, lighting up smokes, cracking vulgar
jokes. Their banter is classic fifties Joe Average talk:
reactionary, meatheaded and exceedingly short-sighted. None
of them seem to be bothered by their radioactive glow -
what the heck! It’s a living. The message in this
clip needs no further clarification.
Humour
- no wonder - can be the special key in balancing irony
with commentary so as to reach an audience and not preach
to it. Even Angry Anderson (of Rose Tattoo) draws some attention
to this possibility in a VC prologue where he does a takeoff
of big bald Brando in “Apocalypse Now”. The
Strangler's rarely seen VC for “Nuclear Device”
(reportedly filmed - and banned - in Queensland) features
them dressed up like reject Chips Raffertys playing instruments
and getting blown up. As aggravating as it is to have Great
White Artists like David Bowie, Jean-Michel Jarre, Werner
Herzog and Dusan Makaveiev concern themselves with our cultural
problems, there is something fairly accurate in The Stranglers
portraying us as dumb colonials ignorantly living our lives
down in ‘Australium’.
I
guess I'm being a bit of a devil's advocate here as I'm
sure there are mamy people of the view that any anti- nuclear
statement should be welcomed. But as I illustrated in the
introduction to this article, the representational mode
employed in organizing any political statement has to seriously
question its own mechanics, machinations and multiple meanings.
Some VCs are totally ignorant of how their imagery can backfire
on them, rendering their intended messages embarrassing
and useless. Other clips are aware of such pitfalls and
employ various means to temporarily subvert, halt or delay
the semantic short-circuits which inevitably flare up in
the presentation of any political viewpoint.
Perhaps
the most important thing to remember is that a VC is no
subcultural/ghetto-ized/in-scene form of communication.
Set in line with television, advertising, film and video,
it can no longer rely on the mythical communicative bonds
it once shared with it audiencies at a subcultural level.
A VC can be as powerful as a film or as bankrupt as an ad
(or vice versa). And worthy global statements on nuclear
issues can not rely on their sympathies alone. Nor can they
presume that their lyric content is some sort of pure and
cutting poetic form, because one would probably not make
the nuclear connections in half the songs cited if there
were no accompanying visuals. It follows that if it's the
clip that predominantly carries such a message, then it
is the clip that should have the most attention paid to
it.
There's
nothing wrong with linking current political concerns to
the previous 'protest' era of the sixties (although “Songs
Of The Protest Era” does it so dumbly!) but a contemporary
visual vernacular has to be developed to prevent the statements
from being perceived as nothing more than nostalgic rhetoric.
The image of a nuclear blast as a nostalgic figure - how
ironic can you get?